metiCulously carved
Human faces
intricate hIeroglyphs
filled with Combinations
of calligrapHic lines -
so-callEd bald, tall
and ecceNtric
mister flInt's jewels
were collecTed from
an idealiZed ruin
by European observers
thief
scholar
tall
bald
eccentric
so-called
Mister Flint
Friday, November 26, 2004
Friday, November 19, 2004
Cantata: the ancient astronomers
the heavens were a vast sphere, made of fire
dimidium ejus spati
for space was infinite and had no center
diapason
its base was the apparent disc of the sun
sixty times the equatorial radius of earth
a cone had its apex at the center of the earth
the distance to the moon and back
each planet lived in spheres numbered four
three spheres confined the moon
fere tantundem
he did not believe in the large parallax
in the region of the clouds and winds
the horizon equally divided the ecliptic
the homocentric spheres
sescuplum
why did the sun show no movement in lattitude?
diapason
the error disappeared at syzygy
in the pure and liquid air of continual light
dimidium
the shadow of the earth reached the sun's orbit
the planets continued gliding in their epicycles
in the lunar parallax
he observed the distances of zenith
at noon for three hundred stadia he saw no shadows
for space was infinite and had no center
dimidium
for space was a sphere, and earth was its center
diapason
Eudoxus
Hipparchus
Thales
Menelaus
Ptolemy
Kleomedes
Archimedes
Posidonius
Theon
dimidium ejus spati
for space was infinite and had no center
diapason
its base was the apparent disc of the sun
sixty times the equatorial radius of earth
a cone had its apex at the center of the earth
the distance to the moon and back
each planet lived in spheres numbered four
three spheres confined the moon
fere tantundem
he did not believe in the large parallax
in the region of the clouds and winds
the horizon equally divided the ecliptic
the homocentric spheres
sescuplum
why did the sun show no movement in lattitude?
diapason
the error disappeared at syzygy
in the pure and liquid air of continual light
dimidium
the shadow of the earth reached the sun's orbit
the planets continued gliding in their epicycles
in the lunar parallax
he observed the distances of zenith
at noon for three hundred stadia he saw no shadows
for space was infinite and had no center
dimidium
for space was a sphere, and earth was its center
diapason
Eudoxus
Hipparchus
Thales
Menelaus
Ptolemy
Kleomedes
Archimedes
Posidonius
Theon
Wednesday, November 17, 2004
A structural idea - time or space
layer 1) abcdea_b_c_d_e_a__b__c__d__e__
layer 2) a_b_c_d_e_a__b__c__d__e__abcde
layer 3) a__b__c__d__e__abcdea_b_c_d_e_
time/space --->
layer 2) a_b_c_d_e_a__b__c__d__e__abcde
layer 3) a__b__c__d__e__abcdea_b_c_d_e_
time/space --->
Saturday, November 06, 2004
Daniel Webster on Military conscription
...Where is it written in the Constitution, in what article or section is it contained, that you may take children from their parents, and compel them to fight the battles of any war in which the folly or the wickedness of government may engage it?
Under what concealment has this power lain hidden which now for the first time comes forth, with a tremendous and baleful aspect, to trample down and destroy the dearest rights of personal liberty? Who will show me any Constitutional injunction which makes it the duty of the American people to surrender everything valuable in life, and even life itself, not when the safety of their country and its liberties may demand the sacrifice, but whenever the purposes of an ambitious and mischievous government may require it?
Sir, I almost disdain to go to quotations and references to prove that such an abominable doctrine has no foundation in the Constitution of the country. It is enough to know that that instrument was intended as the basis of a free government, and that the power contended for is incompatible with any notion of personal liberty. An attempt to maintain this doctrine upon the provisions of the Constitution is an exercise of perverse ingenuity to extract slavery from substance of a free government.
Under what concealment has this power lain hidden which now for the first time comes forth, with a tremendous and baleful aspect, to trample down and destroy the dearest rights of personal liberty? Who will show me any Constitutional injunction which makes it the duty of the American people to surrender everything valuable in life, and even life itself, not when the safety of their country and its liberties may demand the sacrifice, but whenever the purposes of an ambitious and mischievous government may require it?
Sir, I almost disdain to go to quotations and references to prove that such an abominable doctrine has no foundation in the Constitution of the country. It is enough to know that that instrument was intended as the basis of a free government, and that the power contended for is incompatible with any notion of personal liberty. An attempt to maintain this doctrine upon the provisions of the Constitution is an exercise of perverse ingenuity to extract slavery from substance of a free government.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)